Jump to navigation



Innovators Insights




  • Federal agencies to document endangered languages
  • Police program targets suspects in 'shots fired' calls
  • Summary jury trials as alternative dispute resolution

  • Alternative Court Models
  • Related IAG Award Winners
  • Related Research
 
May 13, 2005
What's New
DNA in 'Minor' Crimes Yields Major Benefits in Public Safety
Tuesday, May 31 at 11 a.m. EDT


 


Harvard University's Government Innovators Network, in collaboration with the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, is hosting an online discussion to tap the knowledge and experience of three leaders in the use of DNA evidence. For more information and to register for this exciting event, click here

Federal agencies to document endangered languages
Related Stories Back To Top

Federal agencies partner to document endangered languages

05/05/2005 | US Fed News

Recognizing that the imminent extinction of over 3,000 languages could only be addressed through the unification and integration of separate preservation projects, the National Science Foundation and the National Endowment for the Humanities have created Documenting Endangered Languages (DEL). DEL is a new multi-year, multi-million dollar funding partnership promoting the digitization of dying languages. The program has recently announced its first 13 individual and 26 institutional grant recipients.

Police program targets suspects in 'shots fired' calls
Related Stories Back To Top

Police program targets suspects in 'shots fired' calls

04/22/2005 | Las Vegas Review-Journal (Nevada)

The Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department is working to reduce crime by concentrating manpower on investigating "shots fired" calls. In many urban police departments, following up on reports of "shots fired" is not a priority. However, as part of Las Vegas's Operation Cease Fire, teams of detectives from the gang unit respond to the calls. The aim is to confiscate illegal guns that can be used in future crimes. Police are also considering acquiring the ShotSpotter System--a technology that uses microphones and computers to pinpoint the origin of gunfire--to improve the efficacy of Operation Cease Fire.

Summary jury trials as alternative dispute resolution
Related Stories Back To Top

Summary jury trials slowly catching on as form of alternative dispute resolution

04/27/2005 | St. Charles County Business Record (St. Charles, MO)

Designed as a less expensive and less time-consuming option for courts and litigants, summary jury trials continue to grow in use for cases as diverse as product defects and personal injury concerns. Usually lasting no more than one day, these miniature trials give each party a chance to give their arguments, introduce only the most persuasive evidence or indispensable witness, and allow the jury to make a non-binding decision. For as little as $2,000, both parties receive valuable insight on how the jury would rule in a traditional multiple-week trial, which costs $18,000 on average. The vast majority of these "decided" cases settle quickly.

Alternative Court Models
 

As prisons have become overcrowded and courtrooms overburdened, traditional civil and criminal justice approaches have often been unable to respond to changing times, emerging social problems, and increased public expectations. Instead of reacting to successive crises, some jurisdictions are experimenting with a more holistic approach in addressing the root causes of the cases they oversee. Through unique collaborations with law enforcement, public health, and private agencies, municipalities across the country have replicated and customized models of homelessness courts, domestic violence courts, and mental health courts. These different iterations seem to work.

 

According to a recent Government Accountability Office report, California drug court participants, by taking advantage of structured programs to help them reduce their criminal involvement and their substance abuse problems, tend to have fewer incidents of re-arrests or reconvictions, and a longer time until re-arrest or reconviction. The report suggests that the drug courts could end up saving money even if the up-front costs seem high, as low recidivism rates yield positive net societal benefits. Philadelphia's magistrates, probation officers, social workers, and public defenders agree, and since the creation of a pilot juvenile treatment court, they have observed a strong compliance rate of 80%.

 


Often, women embedded in the cycles of prostitution and drugs are unaware of the physical and medical dangers inherent in their lifestyle. To help them understand and modify their risky behavior, the Central District Court Probation Department in collaboration with other social service agencies in Worcester, MA, have created Developing Alternatives for Women Now. As a condition of their probation, participants attend evening classes in the courthouse after a judge places them in the eight-week program. Professionals assist the women with self-esteem, domestic abuse, relapse, and other issues, and help to arrange for detoxification and related addiction services.

To reduce the high homelessness rate in the South Bronx of New York, several social service agencies have partnered to create a comprehensive court-based homelessness prevention program. Specially trained judges and counsel will now handle housing and eviction cases through the Housing Help Program, while co-located support services will address the background reasons for homelessness. Placing these services under one roof mitigates the disconnect between important agencies charged with protecting the rights of the homeless. City officials believe that the program will go far in helping to reduce the 5000 South Bronx individuals, half of which are children, sleeping in city shelters each night.


 

Related IAG Award Winners
Read about these winners of the Innovations in American Government (IAG) Awards:

 

First Offender Prostitution Program

 

In the mid-1990s, San Francisco spent more than $4 million per year arresting women for prostitution. Most of the women quickly returned to the streets after their arrest. In response to this crisis, authorities began San Francisco's First Offender Prostitution Program in 1995. The program moved financial resources from courtroom prosecution to prevention, offering counseling and job training for prostitutes. Most notably, the program addressed the inequity of a system where the prostitutes, and not their customers, received the harsher legal penalties. The court began offering a "Johns School," for first-time offenders. The program dramatically cut into recidivism rates and has become a model for similar programs across the country.

 

Center for Court Innovation  



Many states experiment with alternative courts and sentencing. But a New York State partnership has made innovative courts an institution. In 1996, the New York State Court System and the nonprofit Fund for the City of New York launched the Center for Court Innovation. The Center works to establish new court prototypes and researches what makes an effective alternative court. The Center for Court Innovation began with four court models, but the organization has since expanded to include many different prototypes of successful "problem-solving" courts. These include domestic violence courts, re-entry courts, family treatment courts, and community courts, which dole out community service as punishment.



Reparative Probation

 

Traditionally, most courts rely on a judge or a jury to decide a sentence. In 1995, the Vermont Department of Corrections took a different approach to sentencing. Under the Reparative Probation program, adults who plead guilty to minor, non-violent crimes are sent to community boards comprised of ordinary citizens. Motivated by the idea that offenders are less likely to commit further crimes if they make amends with their victims, the boards develop creative sentences with the goal of compensating victims. The program has helped reduce Vermont's surging inmate population and served as a model for other states.

Related Research


The U.S. Department of Justice's Office of Justice Programs offers a number of publications on problem-solving courts.


The following research highlights recent changes in court-based approaches:

 

"Community Defenders in the 21st Century: Building on a Tradition of Problem-Solving for Clients, Families and Needy Communities"

Cait Clarke, January 2001, U.S. Department of Justice.

 

"The Rebirth of Rehabilitation: Promise and Perils of Drug Courts"

Richard S. Gebelein, NCJ 181412, May 2000, Research in Brief, National Institute of Justice.

 

"The Detroit Handgun Intervention Program: A Court-Based Program for Youthful Handgun Offenders"

Jeffrey Roth, FS 000231, November 1998, Research in Progress Preview, National Institute of Justice.

 

"Drug Courts and the Role of Graduated Sanctions"

Adele Harrell, FS 000219, August 1998, Research Preview, National Institute of Justice.
Back To Top
NOTE: The articles in this issue will remain active for approximately 90 days.

You were emailed this "Innovators Insights" of the latest government innovations news because you are a registered user of Government Innovators Network® who previously asked to receive it. Please feel free to forward this message to colleagues.

To unsubscribe, first login to http://innovations.harvard.edu using your email address and password. If you have forgotten your password, click here to recover it or set a new password. Once you are logged in, choose "User profile" from the top right corner, then uncheck the box at the bottom labeled "Innovators Insights", and click the "Update Your Profile" button at the bottom of the page.




(HTML template: $Id: innovators_html,v 1.3 2005/04/27 18:45:07 mike Exp $)