login    register    help     

 
About Us
 
Ash Institute
 
Webinars
 
Innovation Awards
 
21st Century Government
 
Innovators Insights Newsletter
 
Multimedia
 
Calendar
 
Groups
 
 
All Topics
 
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
 
Economic and Community Development
 
Education and Training
 
Environment and Natural Resources
 
Finance
 
Governance and Politics
 
Health and Social Services
 
Organizational Management
  Administrative & Regulatory Reform
  Business & Industry
  E-Government
  Human Resources
  Labor Relations
  Leadership
  Performance Measurement & Management
  Procurement
  Public Communications
  Service Delivery
 
Public Infrastructure
 
Technology
 
 
All Themes
 
*Access to Services and Social Justice
 
*Accountability
 
*Collaboration
 
*Education
 
*Environment
 
*Government Performance and Management
 
*Government, Civil Society, and Private Sector Partnerships
 
*Health
 
*Justice and Security
 
*Participation
 
*Pluralism, Diversity, Gender, and Inequality
 
*Social Services
 
*Sustainable Development
 
*Technology
 
Governing by Network: The Answer to Pound's Unanticipated Dissatisfaction
PAGE TOOLS
   
RELATED TOPICS
   
RATE THIS
 
I hate it   I love it
     
1

2

3

4

5
     
 
DIGG THIS
 
 
Published 2009
Author Stephen Goldsmith
Source Indiana Law Journal Supplement
URL Click here to download the full document
PDF: 13 pages, 827 kbytes

Preview

Roscoe Pound first presented his lecture The Causes of Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice in 1906. It was the heyday of the Progressive Era, a government reform movement that coupled concern for social justice with efforts to improve government efficiency. Progressives opposed waste, corruption, and ward politics and sought to change both the quality and scope of government services. Reformers addressed what they viewed as an anemic government response to substantial social problems and widespread corruption.

Fast forward to today: Justice Shepherd asks us to address The Causes of Dissatisfaction Roscoe Pound Never Thought About. In framing this discussion, one needs to consider how judges can affect satisfaction with democratic government and how that satisfaction, in turn, affects them. For courts to satisfy the citizenry, ensure the efficacy of their institutions, and maintain democratic accountability, they need to adapt to significant changes occurring in the delivery of public goods and the exercise of public authority.

   

© 2009 by Harvard University Kennedy School of Government. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Partners | Contact Us | Provide Feedback | Advanced Search
 

ksg Version:   Host: domU-12-31-39-02-3C-51  C3_DB=c3@localhost:3306; GEO_DB=plex-sandbox@localhost; KPLEX_DB=ksg@localhost:3306; SESSION_DB=session@localhost:3306;