login    register    help     

 
About Us
 
Ash Institute
 
Webinars
 
Innovation Awards
 
21st Century Government
 
Innovators Insights Newsletter
 
Multimedia
 
Calendar
 
Groups
 
 
All Topics
 
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
 
Economic and Community Development
 
Education and Training
 
Environment and Natural Resources
 
Finance
  Banking
  Government Finance
  Microfinance
 
Governance and Politics
 
Health and Social Services
 
Organizational Management
 
Public Infrastructure
 
Technology
 
 
All Themes
 
*Access to Services and Social Justice
 
*Accountability
 
*Collaboration
 
*Education
 
*Environment
 
*Government Performance and Management
 
*Government, Civil Society, and Private Sector Partnerships
 
*Health
 
*Justice and Security
 
*Participation
 
*Pluralism, Diversity, Gender, and Inequality
 
*Social Services
 
*Sustainable Development
 
*Technology
 
The Changing Industrial Organization of Housing Finance and the Changing Role of Community-Based Organizations
PAGE TOOLS
   
RELATED TOPICS
   
RATE THIS
 
I hate it   I love it
     
1

2

3

4

5
     
 
DIGG THIS
 
 
Published May 2004
Author William C. Apgar and Allen J. Fishbein
Source Joint Center for Housing Studies, Harvard University
URL Click here to download the full document
PDF: 47 pages, 314 kbytes

Preview

This paper examines forces that are reshaping the mortgage banking industry and the ongoing efforts of community-based organizations (CBOs) to expand access to mortgage capital for lower-income people and communities.  Today's mortgage market bears little resemblance to the one that existed just a few decades ago. Key changes include increasing use of automated underwriting, credit scoring, and risk based pricing, as well as the rise of a mortgage delivery system dominated by mortgage brokers, secondary market activities and national mortgage banking and mortgage servicing operations. While these changes have prompted a surge in lending in lower-income and minority neighborhoods, this growth is linked to the emergence of a dual mortgage delivery system characterized by a noticeable absence of conventional prime mortgages in these same areas. Instead low-income and minority borrowers and communities are today disproportionately served by government-backed, subprime, or manufactured home lending, and exposed to new threats linked to rising rates of mortgage delinquency and default and a noticeable uptick in abusive lending practices.

Even as the dual market has expanded access to capital to families that historically have been shut out of the mortgage market, it has also prompted some CBOs to rethink their role in the marketplace. Following a discussion of the changing structure of the mortgage industry, this paper examines how a small number of CBOs have responded to change by restructuring existing operations and by initiating new programs and activities. In particular, some CBOs have altered their advocacy efforts to expand access to mortgage capital by lower-income people and communities. Others have restructured their community lending programs by partnering with private sector mortgage companies to establish new automated mortgage lending or loan servicing operations, or by creating their own state of the art mortgage lending and servicing systems. Still other approaches just now in their early stage of development - including efforts to combat abusive lending practices, increase the effectiveness of homeownership counseling or expand foreclosure avoidance initiatives - also hold much promise.

Unfortunately, most community groups have not fully digested the enormity of the changes that have occurred in the mortgage banking industry and have failed to make the needed  adjustments. For example, even as private sector lenders are increasingly selling off servicing rights to a handful of mortgage servicing giants, only a relatively few CBOs now outsource their loan servicing operations. This not only prevents small scale CBOs from gaining access to state of the art servicing technology, but also diverts resources and management capacity from away from those activities where the CBO's presence in the community give them a strong comparative advantage over their private sector counterparts. Recognizing the fact that many CBOs continue to do business as they have for decades, the final sections of this paper also examine factors that limit the willingness and ability of CBOs to adapt to the changing market environment.

   

© 2010 by Harvard University Kennedy School of Government. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Partners | Contact Us | Provide Feedback | Advanced Search
 

ksg Version:   Host: domU-12-31-39-02-3C-51  C3_DB=c3@localhost:3306; GEO_DB=plex-sandbox@localhost; KPLEX_DB=ksg@localhost:3306; SESSION_DB=session@localhost:3306;