login    register    help     

About Us
Ash Center
Innovation Awards
Innovators Insights Newsletter
All Topics
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
Economic and Community Development
Education and Training
Environment & Natural Resources
Governance and Politics
Health and Social Services
Organizational Management
  Administrative & Regulatory Reform
  Business & Industry
  Human Resources
  Labor Relations
  Performance Measurement & Management
  Public Communications
  Service Delivery
Public Infrastructure
All Themes
*Access to Services & Social Justice
*Government Performance & Management
*Government, Civil Society, & Private Sector Partnerships
*Justice & Security
*Pluralism, Diversity, Gender, & Inequality
*Social Services
*Sustainable Development
Improving the Local Landscape for Innovation (Part 3): Assessment and Implementation
I hate it   I love it




Published November 2013
Author Gigi Georges, Tim Glynn-Burke, Andrea McGrath
Source Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovations, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University
URL Click here to download the full document
PDF: 65 pages, 637 kbytes


This research paper is one in a series funded by the Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government (HKS). The views expressed in the Ash Center Occasional Papers Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or of Harvard University. The papers in this series are intended to elicit feedback and to encourage debate on important public policy challenges. The series editor is Ash Center Director Tony Saich.


The work of the Ash Center's Innovations in Government Program has revealed that innovation is evolving in cities across the country from a value-based concept into a concrete goal with specific targets — similar to the way that governments have addressed values such as efficiency and transparency. Indeed, city leaders are increasingly designating “innovation” as an area of direct responsibility under city government. While some cities choose to focus on community and private partnerships to promote innovation, others are looking inward and rethinking policies to create more opportunities to test, develop, and implement innovative ideas.

In the first paper, the authors introduce readers to the nature of the work by highlighting current efforts to drive innovation in Boston, Denver, and New York City. They also orient the miniseries within the robust discourse on government innovation. In this second paper, the authors introduce a framework for driving local innovation, which includes a set of strategies and practices developed from the Ash Center’s recent work on social innovation, new first-person accounts, in-depth interviews, practitioner surveys, and relevant literature. The authors explore the roots and composition of the core strategies within their framework and provide evidence of its relevance and utility.

The second paper of the miniseries explores emerging strategies to strengthen the civic, institutional, and political building blocks that are critical to developing novel solutions to public problems — what the authors call the “innovation landscape.” The miniseries builds on past research addressing social innovation and on The Power of Social Innovation (2010) by HKS Professor Stephen Goldsmith.

In this third and final paper of the miniseries, the authors focus on implementation of their framework’s strategies, primarily through the introduction of a unique assessment tool that includes key objectives and suggested indicators for each component of the framework. This final paper also includes a brief case study on New York City’s Center for Economic Opportunity, an award-winning government innovation team, to demonstrate and test the validity of the assessment tool and framework. The paper addresses some likely challenges to implementation and concludes with an invitation to readers to help further refine the framework and to launch a conversation among cities that will help improve their local landscapes for innovation.

Related Documents


© 2014 by Harvard University Kennedy School of Government. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Partners | Contact Us | Provide Feedback | Advanced Search

ksg Version:   Host: ip-10-83-51-59  C3_DB=c3@localhost:3306; GEO_DB=plex-sandbox@localhost; KPLEX_DB=ksg@localhost:3306; SESSION_DB=session@localhost:3306;