login    register    help     

 
About Us
 
Ash Center
 
Webinars
 
Innovation Awards
 
Innovators Insights Newsletter
 
Multimedia
 
Groups
 
 
All Topics
 
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
 
Economic and Community Development
 
Education and Training
 
Environment & Natural Resources
 
Finance
 
Governance and Politics
  Civic Engagement & Social Capital
  Civil Liberties
  Democratization
  E-Government
  Electoral Politics
  Leadership
  Privatization
 
Health and Social Services
 
Organizational Management
 
Public Infrastructure
 
Technology
 
 
All Themes
 
*Access to Services & Social Justice
 
*Accountability
 
*Collaboration
 
*Education
 
*Environment
 
*Government Performance & Management
 
*Government, Civil Society, & Private Sector Partnerships
 
*Health
 
*Justice & Security
 
*Participation
 
*Pluralism, Diversity, Gender, & Inequality
 
*Social Services
 
*Sustainable Development
 
*Technology
 
Managed Competition in Indianapolis:The Case of Indianapolis Fleet Services
PAGE TOOLS
   
RELATED TOPICS
   
RATE THIS
 
I hate it   I love it
     
1

2

3

4

5
     
 
DIGG THIS
 
 
Published December 6, 2005
Author Hai-Chiao Chang, Youhei Itou, Velika Kabakchieva, Lesia Lozowy, Ramon Munoz-Raskin, Rene Ramos, Mark Seaman, and Yasemin Tugce Turner
Source School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University
URL Click here to download the full document
PDF: 20 pages, 246 kbytes

Preview

The City of Indianapolis has been widely touted as a success story for managed competition. Faced with a fiscal crisis, its mayor, Stephen Goldsmith, introduced competitive bidding to redefine the roles of local government and the private sector in providing public services. The results generated greater efficiency, windfalls in savings for the city, as well as in-house units that were able to effectively compete with their private counterparts.

This case focuses on the critical years between 1992 and 1999, when Goldsmith held public office. It traces the challenges he faced in reforming the city's services, and examines the factors that enabled him to do so. Research was conducted through interviews with key participants and analysts, review of government publications and data, as well as other reports and publications. In addition, a study of the Indianapolis Fleet Service as a competitive bidding process model was undertaken. The findings help to illustrate the components necessary for the organization and implementation of competitive bidding in general, which include ensuring a level playing field, supporting the in-house bid, thoroughly developing a bid request, managing the contract and monitoring performance, and using leadership to involve stakeholders such as unions. The potential risks and costs of each factor are also evaluated.

However, when Goldsmith left office, questions arose over the continued advantages of managed competition. The sustainability of the competitive bidding process as an effective tool to improve cost-efficiency and service quality is explored. Moreover, its applicability to other cities is presented through a review of lessons learned from the Indianapolis experience. In Goldsmith's words, "it can be done, but it takes the right amount of incentives and leadership."

   

© 2014 by Harvard University Kennedy School of Government. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Partners | Contact Us | Provide Feedback | Advanced Search
 

ksg Version:   Host: ip-10-83-51-59  C3_DB=c3@localhost:3306; GEO_DB=plex-sandbox@localhost; KPLEX_DB=ksg@localhost:3306; SESSION_DB=session@localhost:3306;