login    register    help     

 
About Us
 
Ash Institute
 
Webinars
 
Innovation Awards
 
21st Century Government
 
Innovators Insights Newsletter
 
Multimedia
 
Calendar
 
Groups
 
 
All Topics
 
Criminal Justice and Public Safety
 
Economic and Community Development
  Agriculture & Food Supply
  Arts and Recreation
  Business Incentives
  Civic Engagement
  Community Revitalization
  Cultural Preservation
  Employment & Labor Supply
  Energy Supply & Distribution
  Entrepreneurship
  Housing
  Poverty Alleviation
 
Education and Training
 
Environment and Natural Resources
 
Finance
 
Governance and Politics
 
Health and Social Services
 
Organizational Management
 
Public Infrastructure
 
Technology
 
 
All Themes
 
*Access to Services and Social Justice
 
*Accountability
 
*Collaboration
 
*Education
 
*Environment
 
*Government Performance and Management
 
*Government, Civil Society, and Private Sector Partnerships
 
*Health
 
*Justice and Security
 
*Participation
 
*Pluralism, Diversity, Gender, and Inequality
 
*Social Services
 
*Sustainable Development
 
*Technology
 

A New Vision for Vacant Land in Cleveland

Marc Lefkovitz
Next American City
October 30, 2009
PAGE TOOLS
   
RELATED TOPICS
   
RATE THIS
 
I hate it   I love it
     
1

2

3

4

5
     
 
DIGG THIS
 
 

Cleveland took a huge step this month in solidifying sustainability as a major organizing force for change. First, Mayor Jackson

, Inc. will hire designers to identify specific parcels where green infrastructure, renewable energy and urban agriculture make sense. It will be the first large-scale implementation of this kind…anywhere. Right here in Cleveland. How did it happen? Certainly not overnight.

Chris Warren, the city’s regional development director, credits the Reimagine a More Sustainable Cleveland study funded by Surdna Foundation. made a strong argument for seeing land through the lens of sustainability as a new model of economic development for Rust Belt cities blessed and cursed with vacancy.

A dozen or so ideas that NPI solicited from the community are about to be funded with city-directed $500,000 in federal Neighborhood Stabilization Program funds. But Warren also credits a group of his Boomer-era peers who cut their teeth as community activists agitating for change back in the 1970s when the feds were still funding their jobs through Community Development Corporations.

The 70s zeitgeist continues with a voluntary group led by Frank Ford at NPI working in concert with County Treasurer Jim Rokakis. The group has focused on the foreclosure scourge, and testified before the Ohio General Assembly on the need for enabling legislation for the Cuyahoga County Landbank—also a groundbreaking land-use tool modeled after Genessee County, Michigan. It would still be in discussion rather than in start-up and acquiring its first properties for reuse if not for Warren, Ford, Rokakis and other leaders who remembered the power of organizing.



Visit source to read full article

   

© 2009 by Harvard University Kennedy School of Government. All Rights Reserved.
About Us | Privacy Policy | Partners | Contact Us | Provide Feedback | Advanced Search
 

ksg Version:   Host: domU-12-31-39-02-3C-51  C3_DB=c3@localhost:3306; GEO_DB=plex-sandbox@localhost; KPLEX_DB=ksg@localhost:3306; SESSION_DB=session@localhost:3306;